Legislature(2005 - 2006)
2006-03-22 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf2006-03-22 Senate Journal Page 2547 HB 489 CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 489(RLS) "An Act relating to the treatment of charity events by the Alaska Public Offices Commission and under the law governing legislative ethics; and providing for an effective date" was read the second time. 2006-03-22 Senate Journal Page 2548 Senator Therriault, Chair, moved and asked unanimous consent for the adoption of the State Affairs Senate Committee Substitute offered on page 2543. Without objection, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 489(STA) "An Act relating to the treatment of charity events by the Alaska Public Offices Commission and under the law governing legislative ethics; relating to a legislative employee's soliciting, accepting, or receiving a gift on behalf of a charitable organization; and providing for an effective date" (Title change SCR 25) was adopted. Senator Gary Stevens moved and asked unanimous consent that the bill be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading and placed on final passage. Without objection, it was so ordered. SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 489(STA) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 489(STA) "An Act relating to the treatment of charity events by the Alaska Public Offices Commission and under the law governing legislative ethics; relating to a legislative employee's soliciting, accepting, or receiving a gift on behalf of a charitable organization; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: SCS CSHB 489(STA) Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date YEAS: 18 NAYS: 1 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Bunde, Cowdery, Dyson, Elton, French, Green, Guess, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, Olson, Seekins, Stedman, Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken Nays: Ellis Absent: Davis and so, SENATE CS FOR CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 489(STA) passed the Senate. 2006-03-22 Senate Journal Page 2549 Senator Gary Stevens moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the effective date clause. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was referred to the Secretary for engrossment.